Speaking in Europe earlier this year, I tried to explain the entire issue of tax competition is less than nine minutes.
To some degree, those remarks were an updated version of a video I narrated back in 2010.
You’ll notice that I criticized the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in both videos.
And with good reason. The Paris-based OECD has been trying to curtail tax competition in hopes of propping up Europe’s uncompetitive welfare states (i.e., enabling “goldfish government“).
As I stated in the second video, the bureaucrats sometimes admit this is their goal. In recent years, though, OECD officials have tried to be more clever, even claiming that they’re pushing for higher taxes because that approach somehow is a recipe for higher growth.
Let’s look at a new example of OECD malfeasance.
We’ll start with something that appears to be innocuous. Or even good news. A report from the OECD points out that corporate tax rates are falling.
Countries have used recent tax reforms to lower taxes on businesses… Across countries, the report highlights the continuation
of a trend toward corporate income tax rate cuts, which has been largely driven by significant reforms in a number of large countries with traditionally high corporate tax rates. The average corporate income tax rate across the OECD has dropped from 32.5% in 2000 to 23.9% in 2018. …the declining trend in the average OECD corporate tax rate has gained renewed momentum in recent years.
Sounds good, right?
From the OECD’s warped perspective, however, good news for the private sector is bad news for governments.
As a result, the bureaucrats are pushing for policies that would penalize jurisdictions with low tax rates.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is going to propose a global minimum tax that would apply country by country before the next meeting of G‑20 finance ministers and central bankers set for 17 Oct. in Washington, DC.
…The OECD’s head of tax policy, Pascal Saint-Amans, said a political push was needed to relaunch the discussions and used the case of the Cayman Islands to explain the proposal. “The idea is if a company operates abroad, and this activity is taxed in a country with a rate below the minimum, the country where the firm is based could recover the difference.” …While this framework is based on an average global rate, Saint-Amans said the OECD is working on a country-by-country basis. Critics of the proposal have said that this would infringe on the fiscal sovereignty of countries.
And as I’ve already noted, the U.S. Treasury Department is not sound on this issue.
This would work in a similar way to the new category of foreign income, global intangible low-tax income (GILTI), introduced for US multinationals by the 2017 US tax reform. GILTI effectively sets a floor of between 10.5% and 13.125% on the average foreign tax rate paid by US multinationals.
There are two aspects of this new OECD effort that are especially disturbing.
First, there’s already an ongoing OECD project to increase the tax burden on the business community.- Second, even the OECD’s own research shows that lower corporate rates haven’t resulted in less tax revenue.
In a perverse way, I admire the OECD’s aggressiveness.
Whatever is happening, the bureaucrats turn it into a reason why tax burdens should increase.
The inescapable conclusion, as explained by Dominik Feusi of Switzerland, is that the OECD is trying to create a tax cartel.
Under the pretext of taxing the big Internet companies, a working group of the OECD on behalf of the G-20 and circumventing the elected parliamentarians of the member countries to a completely new company taxation. …The competition for a good framework for the economy,
including low corporate taxes, will not be abolished, but it will be useless. However, if countries no longer have to take good care of the environment, because they are all equally bad, then they will increase taxes together. …This has consequences, because wages, wealth, infrastructure and social security in Western countries are based on economic growth. Less growth means lower wages. The state can only spend what was first earned in a free economy… The OECD was…once a platform for sharing good economic policy for the common good. This has become today a power cartel of the politicians… They behave as a world government – but without democratic mission and legitimacy.
Veronique de Rugy of the Mercatus Center examined the OECD and decided that American taxpayers should stop subsidizing the Paris-based bureaucracy.
Taxpayers are spending millions of dollars every year funding an army of bureaucrats who advocate higher taxes and bigger government around the globe. Last year, the United States sent $77 million to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the largest single contribution and fully 21 percent of the Paris-based bureaucracy’s $370 million annual budget.
Add to that several million dollars in additional expenses for special projects and the U.S. mission to the OECD. …despite the OECD’s heavy reliance on American taxpayer funds, the organization persistently works against U.S. interests, arguing for international tax cartels, the end of privacy, redistribution schemes and other big-government fantasies. Take its campaign for tax harmonization, begun as a way to protect high-tax nations from bleeding more capital to lower-tax jurisdictions. …The OECD may recognize competition is good in the private sector, but promotes cartelization policies to protect politicians. …The bureaucrats, abetted by the European Union and the United Nations, even started clamoring for the creation of some kind of international tax organization, for global taxation and more explicit forms of tax harmonization.
These articles are spot on.
As you can see from this interview, I’ve repeatedly explained why the OECD’s anti-market agenda is bad news for America.
Which is why, as I argue in this video, American taxpayers should no longer subsidize the OECD.
It’s an older video, but the core issues haven’t changed.
Acting on behalf of Europe’s uncompetitive welfare states, 
the OECD relentlessly promotes a statist agenda.
That’s a threat to the United States. It’s a threat to Europe. And it’s a threat to every other part of the globe.
P.S. To add more insult to all the injury, the tax-loving bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries. Must be nice to be exempt from the bad policies they support.
P.P.S. If you’re not already sick of seeing me on the screen, I also have a three-part video series on tax havens and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the topic.
