• Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate

Navigate

  • Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate
Shifting Blame at the ECB

Shifting Blame at the ECB

Posted on March 7, 2024 by Dan Mitchell

If you asked a reasonably competent economics student to explain why there was a surge of inflation in the eurozone in 2022, that person presumably would be familiar with Milton Friedman’s wisdom and immediately would investigate whether there was a mistake in monetary policy.

Lo and behold, our student would look at the European Central Bank data and say, “what the [expletive deleted], the ECB almost doubled its balance sheet in 2020 and 2021, so of course all that money creation led to rising prices.”

But what if, instead of asking a competent student, you asked some economists at the European Central Bank to answer the same question? Would they reach the obvious conclusion?

Based on a new study from the ECB, it appears the answer is no.

…euro area inflation since 2021 has been driven by both supply and demand factors, with the former playing a primary role. Supply-side shocks were mostly related to energy and food price shocks, partly due to the invasion of Ukraine. At the same time the euro area was hit by an inflationary shock stemming from the combination of pent-up demand for goods and services that accumulated due to subdued spending and excess saving during pandemic lockdowns, and shortages of these goods due to supply chain disruptions. According to the model these shocks exhibit a large degree of persistence; other supply-side shocks, like energy and food, generally have a more temporary impact on price inflation, as those cost-push shocks also reduce income and, hence, aggregate demand.

This is professional malpractice. Though, given the crass blame-shifting by the the political hack who now is in charge of the ECB, I guess we shouldn’t be surprised by such sloppy analysis. For the economics profession, this is sort of like having arsonists investigate fires.

And in case you think I’m selectively excerpting a passage to make the ECB look bad, I invite you to search the study for “balance sheet.” Those two words are completely absent.

Moreover, I did a search for “monetary policy” and got some hits, but none of them were about the ECB’s near-doubling of its balance sheet.

All of which has motivated me to create a meme.

P.S. The ECB is not alone. There’s also been blame-shifting in Canada and the United Kingdom. It’s almost enough to make one think that central bankers shouldn’t be on a pedestal.


easy money ECB Euro Europe European Central Bank Monetary Policy
March 7, 2024
Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell is co-founder of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity and Chairman of the Board. He is an expert in international tax competition and supply-side tax policy.

Find Us On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @CFandP
"I write to express support for the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's support of tax competition."
    
~ Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate ~


 "By fighting against an international tax cartel and working to preserve financial privacy, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity is protecting taxpayers, both in America and around the world."
    
~ Rep. Dick Armey, Former Majority Leader, U.S. House of Reps. ~
  • Home
  • About CF&P and CF&P Foundation
  • Donate
  • News
  • Publications
  • Opinion and Commentary
  • Market Center Blog
  • Videos
© Copyright 2014, All Rights Reserved.