• Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate

Navigate

  • Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate
The Optimistic Case for Spending Restraint

The Optimistic Case for Spending Restraint

Posted on April 3, 2023 by Dan Mitchell

Every president this century – Biden, Trump, Obama, and Bush – has been a big spender. But I told an audience at the Acton Institute that there are still reasons for optimism.

All that is necessary is a modest amount of spending restraint.

More specifically, we can make progress so long as politicians follow my golden rule, which merely requires that the burden of government spending not grow faster than the private sector.

And I gave examples of that happening.

For instance, we had a five-year de facto spending freeze under Obama (including a sequester), thanks to the “Tea Party” spirit that temporarily animated Republicans on Capitol Hill.

I also mentioned the spending restraint that occurred during the Clinton years, which actually led to a budget surplus.

Reagan, of course, had the best track record.

As shown in this chart, the overall burden of domestic spending fell by 2.5 percentage points of economic output during his tenure.

We now know that good things happened in the past.

Let’s close by contemplating whether good things might happen in the future.

I am normally a pessimist, but I pointed out in the video that Republicans on Capitol Hill actually pushed for genuine entitlement reform during the aforementioned Tea Party era early last decade.

That zeal for good policy largely evaporated during the big-government Trump years, but I think it could return if a Reagan-style Republican won the nomination and was elected in 2024.

The bottom line is that we either control spending – including entitlement reform, or we surrender to European-style big government – including massive tax increases on ordinary people.

Those are the only two choices.

———
Image credit: Bjoertvedt | CC BY-SA 3.


entitlements fiscal policy government spending Spending Cap
April 3, 2023
Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell is co-founder of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity and Chairman of the Board. He is an expert in international tax competition and supply-side tax policy.

Find Us On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @CFandP
"I write to express support for the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's support of tax competition."
    
~ Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate ~


 "By fighting against an international tax cartel and working to preserve financial privacy, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity is protecting taxpayers, both in America and around the world."
    
~ Rep. Dick Armey, Former Majority Leader, U.S. House of Reps. ~
  • Home
  • About CF&P and CF&P Foundation
  • Donate
  • News
  • Publications
  • Opinion and Commentary
  • Market Center Blog
  • Videos
© Copyright 2014, All Rights Reserved.