• Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate

Navigate

  • Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate
Spending Caps and the Benefit of Fiscal Restraint

Spending Caps and the Benefit of Fiscal Restraint

Posted on December 21, 2023 by Dan Mitchell

When making the case for spending caps, the best domestic example is Colorado and the best international example is Switzerland.

What makes the Swiss example especially persuasive is a comparison over the past 20 years between spending growth in Switzerland and the United States.

To use an education analogy, Switzerland is a star student (2.2 percent annual spending growth) and the United States is flunking (4.9 percent annual spending growth).

What’s particularly disappointing, as I wrote a couple of years ago, is that America’s current fiscal mess wouldn’t exist if politicians had been constrained by a spending cap.

In a column for the Wall Street Journal back in October, Grover Norquist and Vance Ginn discussed how national (and state) politicians have dug deep fiscal holes.

Left-wing politicians assert that Americans are undertaxed, but the data show that the government spends too much. …Between 2013 and 2022, aggregate annual spending by the 50 state governments, excluding federal funds, increased 51.7%. Total annual federal spending rose 69.4% during the decade, more than three times as fast as the 21.6% increase in the rate of population growth plus inflation. …Had the federal government limited the growth in spending to a maximum of the population growth rate plus inflation during that decade, in 2022 the federal government would have spent $1.6 trillion less than it did, resulting in at least a $200 billion surplus. If the federal government had done this over the past two decades, the national debt would have increased by less than $500 billion instead of $19 trillion. If state governments had limited spending growth to the rate of population growth plus inflation during the last decade, they would have spent $1.39 trillion in 2022, $344 billion less than the $1.74 trillion they actually spent.

Amen. Spending caps are the gold standard of fiscal policy.

There are many reasons the United States should copy Switzerland (decentralization, private pension system, trade liberalization, quality governance, etc), and the Swiss spending cap is at the top of the list.


fiscal policy government spending Spending Cap
December 21, 2023
Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell is co-founder of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity and Chairman of the Board. He is an expert in international tax competition and supply-side tax policy.

Find Us On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @CFandP
"I write to express support for the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's support of tax competition."
    
~ Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate ~


 "By fighting against an international tax cartel and working to preserve financial privacy, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity is protecting taxpayers, both in America and around the world."
    
~ Rep. Dick Armey, Former Majority Leader, U.S. House of Reps. ~
  • Home
  • About CF&P and CF&P Foundation
  • Donate
  • News
  • Publications
  • Opinion and Commentary
  • Market Center Blog
  • Videos
© Copyright 2014, All Rights Reserved.