• Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate

Navigate

  • Home
  • About CF&P
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Updates
  • Publications
    • Prosperitas Studies
    • Testimony and Speeches
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Videos
    • Economic Lessons Series
    • Economics 101 Educational Series
  • Donate
Red States vs. Blue States, Part IV

Red States vs. Blue States, Part IV

Posted on October 5, 2023 by Dan Mitchell

In our series on red states vs blue states, we’ve examined different economic variables.

  • Part I: Economic growth
  • Part II: Unemployment rates
  • Part III: Employment growth

Today, let’s add another comparison.

Here’s a map looking at 2022 income growth by state. The three states most known for bad policy – New York, Illinois, and California – were among the handful of states that suffered a decline in personal income.

It’s also worth noting that most of the “weaker than average” states also are known for leaning left.

The Wall Street Journal has an editorial on the performance gap between red states and blue states. Here are some excerpts.

Personal income in California, Illinois and New York declined in 2022 for the first time since 2009… Personal income last year nationwide increased 2% in current dollars, which amounts to a real decline after inflation. …The opposite was true in the fastest-growing states, including Florida (4.7%), Arizona (4.9%), Texas (5%), Utah (5.5%), Colorado (5.8%), South Dakota (5.8%), Montana (6.1%), Idaho (6.5%), North Dakota (7%), and Delaware (8.8%). …The personal income declines in California, New York, Illinois and some other states would have been larger if not for the continued growth in Medicaid spending owing to the pandemic national emergency, which didn’t end until this spring. A federal food-stamp fillip also continued until March. …California, New York and Illinois used their allotments largely to cover pre-existing budget shortfalls, boost government worker pay, and bake into their budget new spending obligations. Those will become shortfalls once the pandemic money boom ends. Taxpayers, look out.

The last few sentences above are key.

When they get new money, either from tax increases or federal transfers, irresponsible politicians create long-run spending obligations.

And that creates the conditions for future tax increases, just as the WSJ warns.

Here’s one final item for today’s column. Back in July, the Wall Street Journal compared industry performance in red states and blue states.

Here’s a table comparing Texas and Florida vs. New York and California.

Game, set, and match.

The moral of the story is that big government doesn’t work well on the national level, it doesn’t work well on the state level, and it doesn’t work well on the local level.


big government Competitiveness States
October 5, 2023
Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell

Dan Mitchell is co-founder of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity and Chairman of the Board. He is an expert in international tax competition and supply-side tax policy.

Find Us On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @CFandP
"I write to express support for the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's support of tax competition."
    
~ Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate ~


 "By fighting against an international tax cartel and working to preserve financial privacy, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity is protecting taxpayers, both in America and around the world."
    
~ Rep. Dick Armey, Former Majority Leader, U.S. House of Reps. ~
  • Home
  • About CF&P and CF&P Foundation
  • Donate
  • News
  • Publications
  • Opinion and Commentary
  • Market Center Blog
  • Videos
© Copyright 2014, All Rights Reserved.