For years, I’ve been explaining that students have been hurt rather than helped by government programs to allegedly make higher education more affordable.
How can this be true?
For the simple reason that colleges and universities dramatically boosted tuition in response to all the government subsidies.
Did students somehow benefit?
Hardly. In addition to much higher tuition and fees, the higher-education sector became more bloated, with much more bureaucracy and much lighter workloads.
So the people working for colleges and universities were big beneficiaries.
Students, by contrast, got put on a backwards treadmill featuring more loans, higher tuition, and more debt.
Given this background, I was interested to see a column in the New York Times describing how students at Bennett College (and elsewhere) have been disadvantaged by the current system.
Here’s the headline from the piece, which was written by Tressie McMillan Cottom.
While I certainly sympathize with students who are now trapped in this system, I was left unsatisfied by both the above headline and the actual details of Ms. Cottom’s column.
Why?
Because there was a lot of discussion about the consequences of the current system but zero recognition that government is the reason colleges and universities are now so expensive and bureaucratic.
So I decided to make a modest correction to the headline.
Ms. Cottom thinks the answer is student loan forgiveness, which simply means other people pick up the tab.
That’s a perverse form of redistribution since people who went to college have higher earnings than the general population.
I don’t like redistribution in general, but redistributing form poor to rich is particularly perverse.
But even I might be willing to embrace loan forgiveness if something was being do to solve the underlying problem of the government-caused tuition spiral.
Needless to say, that’s not part of the discussion in Washington.
P.S. The underlying economic problem is “third-party payer.” It’s wreaked havoc with America’s health sector and it’s have the same pernicious effect on higher education.
