When I argue with my statist friends about the proper size and scope of government, they accuse me of not wanting public services.
My typical response is to explain that I am a strong supporter of markets as the method to get high-quality roads, schools, and healthcare.
But I’m wondering whether this answer pays too much attention to the trees and doesn’t focus on the forest.
After all, the debate isn’t whether we should be Liberland or Venezuela. It’s whether government should be bigger or smaller compared to what we have now.
So the next time I tussle with my left-leaning buddies, I’m going to share this chart (based on data from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook database) and ask them why we can’t be like the fast-growing, small-government nations of Asia.
To elaborate, not only do jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore enjoy impressive growth, they also get very high scores for infrastructure, education, and health outcomes.
In other words, these nations are role models for “public sector efficiency.”
What they don’t have, by contrast, are expensive welfare states that seem to be correlated with poor outcome for basic public services.
For all intents and purposes, I want to focus the debate on how much government is necessary to get the things people want, sort of like I did in Paris back in 2013.
I asked the audience whether they thought that their government, which consumes 57 percent of GDP, gives them better services than Germany’s government, which consumes 45 percent of GDP. They said no. I then asked if they got better government than citizens of Canada, where government consumes 41 percent of GDP. They said no. And I concluded by asking them whether they got better government than the people of Switzerland, where government is only 34 percent of economic output… Once again, they said no.
I assume (hope) Americans also would say no given these choices. And hopefully they would say yes when asked if we should be like Hong Kong and Singapore.
P.S. If I rotated the above chart clockwise by 90 degrees we’d have a pretty good approximation of the downward-sloping portion of the Rahn Curve.
———
Image credit: sm-ekb2005 | Pixabay License.
