The late George Stigler, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics, is famous in part because of his work on “regulatory capture,” which occurs when interest groups use the coercive power of government to thwart competition and undeservedly line their own pockets. A perfect (and distasteful) example of this can be found in the Washington Post, which reports that the IRS plans to impose new regulations dictating who can prepare tax returns. Not surprisingly, the new rules have the support of big tax preparation shops such as H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt, which see this as an opportunity to squeeze smaller competitors out of the market. The IRS and the big firms claim more regulations are needed to protect consumers from shoddy work, but this is the usual rationale for licensing laws and other government-imposed barriers to entry and the Institute for Justice repeatedly has shown such rules are designed to benefit insiders rather than consumers. Tax preparers do make many mistakes, to be sure, but that is a reflection of a nightmarish tax code, and the annual tax test conducted by Money magazine showed that even the most-skilled professionals – such as CPAs, tax lawyers, and enrolled agents – were unable to figure out how to correctly fill out a hypothetical family’s tax return. But since the IRS routinely makes major mistakes as well, perhaps the moral of the story is that we need fundamental tax reform, not IRS rules to create a cartel for the benefit of H&R Block and other big firms. Would any of this be an issue if we had a flat tax or national sales tax?
The Internal Revenue Service plans to test, register and screen people who get paid to prepare tax returns, stepping into a virtually unregulated business on which millions of Americans depend for crucial financial services. The agency wants to crack down on preparers who do shoddy or fraudulent work and create a way for consumers to make more informed choices — though the moves could increase the cost of having tax returns prepared. “In most states you need a license to cut someone’s hair,” but today “most tax-return preparers don’t have to meet any standards when they sit down and prepare a federal tax return for an American taxpayer,” IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman said in an interview Monday. …Starting with the 2011 tax season, the IRS plans to require paid preparers to register with the agency. Subsequently — the timeline is not yet firm — they will be required to pass competency tests and receive continuing professional education. …The new testing and education standards will exempt certified public accountants, lawyers, and tax practitioners known as “enrolled agents,” who are cleared to represent taxpayers in dealing with the IRS and are already subject to professional or government requirements. …Tax prep giants H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt expressed support for the requirements announced Monday. Under the new rules, H&R Block “won’t be competing against people who aren’t regulated and don’t have the same standards as we do,” said Kathryn Fulton, senior vice president for government relations. …Citing a gap in the agency’s plan, Fulton said the IRS should impose the same rules on unpaid preparers of tax returns. …In field tests, the IRS noted Monday, tax-return preparers often gave bad advice. In a 2006 study in which employees of the Government Accountability Office posed as taxpayers and visited outlets of tax prep chains, all 19 preparers made mistakes, the IRS reported. …It is unclear how much of the blame rests with the tax code’s confusing nature, a perennial target of politicians’ criticism. Do regulated professionals such as CPAs perform better than their unregulated counterparts? The IRS commissioner said the agency does not have the data to answer that question.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/04/AR2010010 401651.html
