<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Center for Freedom and Prosperity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Coalition for Tax Competition Letter Seeks Withdrawal of Destructive IRS Interest-Reporting Regulation</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/press-releases/ctc-letter-seeks-withdrawal-irs-interest-reporting-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/press-releases/ctc-letter-seeks-withdrawal-irs-interest-reporting-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF&#38;P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition for Tax Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonresident alien interest reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REG-146097-09]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation, joined by 23 of the country’s most influential free market and taxpayer rights organizations, sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner urging withdrawal of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulation that would discourage capital from the U.S. economy and weaken the American financial system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: x-large;">Center for Freedom and Prosperity<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>For Immediate Release<br />
Tuesday, February 21, 2012<br />
202-285-0244</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/">www.freedomandprosperity.org</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size: x-large;">Coalition for Tax Competition Letter Seeks Withdrawal of Destructive IRS Interest-Reporting Regulation</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>(Washington, D.C., Tuesday, February 21, 2012)</strong> The <span style="color: #000080;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/">Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation</a></span></span>, joined by 23 of the country’s most influential free market and taxpayer rights organizations, sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner urging withdrawal of an <span style="color: #000080;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.irs.gov/">Internal Revenue Service</a></span></span> (IRS) regulation that would discourage capital from the U.S. economy and weaken the American financial system. The rule (<span style="color: #000080;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.irs.gov/irb/2011-08_IRB/ar13.html">REG-146097-09</a></span></span>), proposed in January 2011, would force U.S. banks to report deposit interest paid to nonresident aliens – even in the face of 90-plus years of law designed to attract such funds and despite bipartisan Congressional opposition. Text of the letter can be found below.</p>
<p><strong>Link to Coalition for Tax Competition Letter:</strong><br />
<a href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/letters/second-letter-to-secretary-geithner-on-irs-reporting-regulation/">http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/letters/second-letter-to-secretary-geithner-on-irs-reporting-regulation/</a></p>
<p>The letter from the Coalition for Tax Competition expresses the frustration felt by many who would be impacted by a regulation that &#8220;will do considerable damage to the U.S. economy and its already fragile banking system,&#8221; while serving no domestic tax purpose. The letter also highlights the failure of the IRS &#8220;to conduct a cost-benefit analysis on the rule,&#8221; most likely &#8220;because there is no benefit and they are unwilling to address the considerable evidence regarding the regulation&#8217;s high costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to the arguments cited in the letter, the regulation would have serious human rights implications for many living overseas, who turn to the U.S. banking system as a source of security, stability and safe keeping. Exposing the deposit information of citizens from countries such as Venezuala and Mexico to their home governments is often tantamount to placing them and their families in harm’s way.</p>
<p>The IRS has continued to pursue implemention of the rule despite strong bipartisan opposition from Congress, organized under the leadership of Senator&#8217;s Rubio, Nelson, Cornyn and Hutchison, as well as Rep. Posey in the House of Representatives.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only people who support this regulation are international tax bureaucrats and tax-and-spend zealots in Washington,&#8221; notes <strong>Andrew Quinlan, President of the </strong><span style="color: #000080;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/">Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation</a></span></span>. &#8220;Lawmakers of both parties who are elected to serve the interests of American taxpayers are overwhelmingly against this regulation.&#8221;</p>
<p>“This proposed regulation would be the camel’s nose under the tent,” warned <strong>Dan Mitchell of the <a href="http://www.cato.org">Cato Institute</a></strong>, who added that, “the IRS, if successful with this proposal, will doubtlessly demand reporting of other forms of interest, as well as capital gains.”</p>
<p><strong>Additional comments from Coalition for Tax Competition Signers:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US"><strong>John Berlau, Director, Ctr. for Investors and Entrepreneurs, Competitive Enterprise Institute:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8220;All at once, this rule would (A) Reduce U.S. competitiveness in attracting foreign capital; (B) harm the safety and soundness of U.S. banks and credit unions; (C) threaten the privacy and safety interests of individuals throughout the world by putting sensitive information in the hands of governments with lax data security systems, in which criminal gangs could access the data to target victims for kidnapping; (D) empower corrupt dictators by giving them access to financial information of dissidents who may hold U.S. accounts.”</p>
<p lang="en-US"><strong>Pete Sepp, Executive Vice President, National Taxpayers Union:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8220;America&#8217;s prosperity already suffers because of an uncompetitive tax system, and this interest reporting regulation would make the pain much worse. While Congress must do the heavy lifting on tax reform, the Treasury can and should keep from adding to the burden by canceling this unnecessary and unproductive rule.&#8221;</p>
<p lang="en-US"><strong>J. Bradley Jansen, Director, Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8220;It is no secret that tyrannical regimes in history have used bank and tax information for gross violations of human rights. The IRS simply cannot guarantee that information will not be shared with any country that will now or in the future abuse the information, and thus must rescind the proposal.&#8221;</p>
<p lang="en-US"><strong>Palmer Schoening, Director of Federal Affairs, American Family Business Institute:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8220;Pushing capital overseas will harm the family businesses which rely heavily on its availability. At a time when the economy is still struggling to recover and generate jobs, it is foolish to make it harder for family businesses to expand and add workers.”</p>
<p><strong>Bill Wilson, </strong><strong>President, Americans for Limited Government:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">“The IRS is creating a mountain of paperwork to report interest income of foreign persons that is not even taxable under current law. There is simply no upside for a regulation that will have the same effect as a tax on such income, which is to drive foreign investment out of the U.S. What was the IRS thinking?”</p>
<p lang="en-US"><strong>Seton Motley, President, Less Government:</strong></p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8220;We have spent the last sixty plus years ratcheting up the taxes and regulations on businesses.  We then act surprised when they leave for other, more friendly countries in which to do business.  President Obama&#8217;s answer to this government-induced problem is – more government.  Preventing this latest reporting regulation from being effected is an important step towards returning to tax and regulatory sanity – and increased domestic employment.&#8221;</p>
<p>___________________________________________</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[<a href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/files/NRAreg/ctc-geithner2012-02.pdf">PDF of Letter</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Text of Letter and List of Signers</strong></p>
<p>February 20, 2012</p>
<p>Hon. Timothy F. Geithner<br />
Secretary of the Treasury<br />
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20220</p>
<p>Dear Secretary Geithner:</p>
<p>We are troubled by the Treasury Department&#8217;s failure to withdraw a rule that faces near universal opposition, provides no benefit to the U.S., and threatens to drive billions in much needed foreign investment out of the economy. We are therefore writing again to express our opposition to the nonresident alien deposit interest reporting regulation (REG-146097-09), and ask that it be withdrawn.</p>
<p>As has been argued by both members of Congress and financial experts, the regulation will do considerable damage to the U.S. economy and its already fragile banking system. There is no requirement under existing tax treaties that this information be reported, nor any obligation to impose regulatory burdens for the purpose of enforcing other nations&#8217; laws.</p>
<p>Moreover, the IRS has failed to conduct a cost-benefit analysis on the rule, presumably because there is no benefit and they are unwilling to address the considerable evidence regarding the regulation&#8217;s high costs.</p>
<p>At a time when lawmakers remain focused on increasing employment, it is imprudent for the IRS to consider regulations that would drive job-creating investment out of the country. We ask again that this regulation be withdrawn.</p>
<p>Sincerely ,</p>
<p>Andrew F. Quinlan ~ President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation<br />
Grover Norquist ~ President, Americans for Tax Reform<br />
Pete Sepp ~ Executive Vice President, National Taxpayers Union<br />
Phil Kerpen ~ Vice President for Policy, Americans for Prosperity<br />
R. Bruce Josten ~ Executive Vice President Government Affairs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce<br />
J. Bradley Jansen ~ Director, Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights<br />
John Berlau ~ Director, Ctr. for Investors and Entrepreneurs, Competitive Enterprise Institute<br />
Karen Kerrigan ~ President &amp; CEO, Small Business &amp; Entrepreneurship Council<br />
Terrence Scanlon ~ President, Capital Research Center<br />
Eli Lehrer ~ National Director and Vice President, The Heartland Institute<br />
Erika Nolan ~ Executive Director, The Sovereign Society<br />
Wayne Brough ~ Chief Economist and Vice President of Research, FreedomWorks<br />
David Williams ~ President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance<br />
Carrie Lukas ~ Managing Director, Independent Women&#8217;s Forum<br />
Jim Martin ~ Chairman, 60 Plus Association<br />
Tom Giovanetti ~ President, Institute for Policy Innovation<br />
Lew Uhler ~ President, National Tax Limitation Committee<br />
Thomas A. Schatz ~ President, Citizens Against Government Waste<br />
Bill Wilson ~ President, Americans for Limited Government<br />
Stephen J. Entin ~ President and Executive Director, Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation<br />
Seton Motley ~ President, Less Government<br />
Palmer Schoening ~ Director of Federal Affairs, American Family Business Institute<br />
Mario H. Lopez ~ President, Hispanic Leadership Fund<br />
Charles Sauer ~ President, Market Institute</p>
<p>___________________________________________</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>For additional comments</strong>:<br />
Andrew Quinlan can be reached at 202-285-0244, <a href="mailto:andy@freedomandprosperity.org">andy@freedomandprosperity.org</a><br />
Dan Mitchell can be reached at 202-218-4615, <a href="mailto:dmitchell@cato.org">dmitchell@cato.org</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">###</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/press-releases/ctc-letter-seeks-withdrawal-irs-interest-reporting-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Letter to Secretary Geithner on IRS Reporting Regulation</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/letters/second-letter-to-secretary-geithner-on-irs-reporting-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/letters/second-letter-to-secretary-geithner-on-irs-reporting-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF&#38;P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition for Tax Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonresident alien interest reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REG-146097-09]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are troubled by the Treasury Department's failure to withdraw a rule that faces near universal opposition, provides no benefit to the U.S., and threatens to drive billions in much needed foreign investment out of the economy. We are therefore writing again to express our opposition to the nonresident alien deposit interest reporting regulation (REG-146097-09), and ask that it be withdrawn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>[<a href="/files/NRAreg/ctc-geithner2012-02.pdf">PDF Version</a>]</strong></p>
<p>February 20, 2012</p>
<p>Hon. Timothy F. Geithner<br />
Secretary of the Treasury<br />
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20220</p>
<p>Dear Secretary Geithner:</p>
<p>We are troubled by the Treasury Department&#8217;s failure to withdraw a rule that faces near universal opposition, provides no benefit to the U.S., and threatens to drive billions in much needed foreign investment out of the economy. We are therefore writing again to express our opposition to the nonresident alien deposit interest reporting regulation (REG-146097-09), and ask that it be withdrawn.</p>
<p>As has been argued by both members of Congress and financial experts, the regulation will do considerable damage to the U.S. economy and its already fragile banking system. There is no requirement under existing tax treaties that this information be reported, nor any obligation to impose regulatory burdens for the purpose of enforcing other nations&#8217; laws.</p>
<p>Moreover, the IRS has failed to conduct a cost-benefit analysis on the rule, presumably because there is no benefit and they are unwilling to address the considerable evidence regarding the regulation&#8217;s high costs.</p>
<p>At a time when lawmakers remain focused on increasing employment, it is imprudent for the IRS to consider regulations that would drive job-creating investment out of the country. We ask again that this regulation be withdrawn.</p>
<p>Sincerely ,</p>
<p>Andrew F. Quinlan ~ President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation<br />
Grover Norquist ~ President, Americans for Tax Reform<br />
Pete Sepp ~ Executive Vice President, National Taxpayers Union<br />
Phil Kerpen ~ Vice President for Policy, Americans for Prosperity<br />
R. Bruce Josten ~ Executive Vice President Government Affairs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce<br />
J. Bradley Jansen ~ Director, Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights<br />
John Berlau ~ Director, Ctr. for Investors and Entrepreneurs, Competitive Enterprise Institute<br />
Karen Kerrigan ~ President &amp; CEO, Small Business &amp; Entrepreneurship Council<br />
Terrence Scanlon ~ President, Capital Research Center<br />
Eli Lehrer ~ National Director and Vice President, The Heartland Institute<br />
Erika Nolan ~ Executive Director, The Sovereign Society<br />
Wayne Brough ~ Chief Economist and Vice President of Research, FreedomWorks<br />
David Williams ~ President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance<br />
Carrie Lukas ~ Managing Director, Independent Women&#8217;s Forum<br />
Jim Martin ~ Chairman, 60 Plus Association<br />
Tom Giovanetti ~ President, Institute for Policy Innovation<br />
Lew Uhler ~ President, National Tax Limitation Committee<br />
Thomas A. Schatz ~ President, Citizens Against Government Waste<br />
Bill Wilson ~ President, Americans for Limited Government<br />
Stephen J. Entin ~ President and Executive Director, Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation<br />
Seton Motley ~ President, Less Government<br />
Palmer Schoening ~ Director of Federal Affairs, American Family Business Institute<br />
Mario H. Lopez ~ President, Hispanic Leadership Fund<br />
Charles Sauer ~ President, Market Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/letters/second-letter-to-secretary-geithner-on-irs-reporting-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Won’t Washington Understand that Paying People to Be Unemployed Means More Unemployment?</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/why-won%e2%80%99t-washington-understand-that-paying-people-to-be-unemployed-means-more-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/why-won%e2%80%99t-washington-understand-that-paying-people-to-be-unemployed-means-more-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joblessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve written periodically about the perverse incentives of the unemployment insurance system. Simply stated, there will be fewer jobs if the government subsidizes joblessness, and I even showed that this... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/why-won%e2%80%99t-washington-understand-that-paying-people-to-be-unemployed-means-more-unemployment/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I’ve written periodically about the perverse incentives of the unemployment insurance system.  Simply stated, there will be fewer jobs if the government subsidizes  joblessness, and I even showed that this is a consensus position by citing the acad]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/why-won%e2%80%99t-washington-understand-that-paying-people-to-be-unemployed-means-more-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriotism, Loyalty, Tax Competition, and “Tax Fugitives”</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-%e2%80%9ctax-fugitives%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-%e2%80%9ctax-fugitives%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switzerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fight to preserve tax competition, fiscal sovereignty, and financial privacy for the simple reason that politicians are less likely to impose destructive tax policy if they know that labor... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-%e2%80%9ctax-fugitives%e2%80%9d/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I fight to preserve tax competition, fiscal sovereignty, and financial privacy for the simple reason that politicians are less likely to impose  destructive tax policy if they know that labor and capital can escape to  jurisdictions with more respons]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-%e2%80%9ctax-fugitives%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Lesson for Krugman, et al, about Canada’s Real Fiscal Restraint vs. the United Kingdom’s Faux Austerity</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/a-lesson-for-krugman-et-al-about-canada%e2%80%99s-real-fiscal-restraint-vs-the-united-kingdom%e2%80%99s-faux-austerity/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/a-lesson-for-krugman-et-al-about-canada%e2%80%99s-real-fiscal-restraint-vs-the-united-kingdom%e2%80%99s-faux-austerity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynesian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynesian Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demonstrating that he’s probably not a fan of Mitchell’s Golden Rule, Paul Krugman recently asserted that fiscal austerity has failed in the United Kingdom. Citing Keynesian theory and weak economics... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/a-lesson-for-krugman-et-al-about-canada%e2%80%99s-real-fiscal-restraint-vs-the-united-kingdom%e2%80%99s-faux-austerity/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Demonstrating that he’s probably not a fan of Mitchell’s Golden Rule, Paul Krugman recently asserted that fiscal austerity has failed in the United Kingdom.

Citing Keynesian theory and weak economics numbers, he warned about  “the austerity ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/a-lesson-for-krugman-et-al-about-canada%e2%80%99s-real-fiscal-restraint-vs-the-united-kingdom%e2%80%99s-faux-austerity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex and the Power of Economics</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/sex-and-the-power-of-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/sex-and-the-power-of-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laffer Curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though there is a wealth of evidence for the Laffer Curve, statists and other big-government advocates routinely claim that incentives don’t matter. So I wonder how they’ll react to... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/sex-and-the-power-of-economics/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even though there is a wealth of evidence for the Laffer Curve, statists and other big-government advocates routinely claim that incentives don’t matter.

So I wonder how they’ll react to this new research showing that incentives have an impact]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/sex-and-the-power-of-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even with a Volatile Stock Market, Personal Retirement Accounts Are Better and Safer than Social Security</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/even-with-a-volatile-stock-market-personal-retirement-accounts-are-better-and-safer-than-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/even-with-a-volatile-stock-market-personal-retirement-accounts-are-better-and-safer-than-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare and Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal retirement accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early last year, CF&#38;P released this video, narrated by yours truly, making the case that the United States and other nations should shift from a tax-and-transfer entitlement scheme to a... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/even-with-a-volatile-stock-market-personal-retirement-accounts-are-better-and-safer-than-social-security/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Early last year, CF&amp;P released this video,  narrated by yours truly, making the case that the United States and  other nations should shift from a tax-and-transfer entitlement scheme to  a system of personal retirement accounts.



Some left ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/even-with-a-volatile-stock-market-personal-retirement-accounts-are-better-and-safer-than-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanks to these Horror Stories of Stupidity and Incompetence, Prepare to Downgrade Your Opinion of Big Government</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/thanks-to-these-horror-stories-of-stupidity-and-incompetence-prepare-to-downgrade-your-opinion-of-big-government/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/thanks-to-these-horror-stories-of-stupidity-and-incompetence-prepare-to-downgrade-your-opinion-of-big-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boondoggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government incompetence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government thuggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I’m obviously not a fan of big government, I have mixed feelings about why the public sector is so blindly wasteful. Is it because politicians and bureaucrats are well-intentioned... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/thanks-to-these-horror-stories-of-stupidity-and-incompetence-prepare-to-downgrade-your-opinion-of-big-government/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[While I’m obviously not a fan of big government, I have mixed feelings about why the public sector is so blindly wasteful.

Is it because politicians and bureaucrats are well-intentioned morons who accidentally do damage (as illustrated by this c]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/thanks-to-these-horror-stories-of-stupidity-and-incompetence-prepare-to-downgrade-your-opinion-of-big-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can Obama Look at these Two Charts and Conclude that America Should Have Higher Double Taxation of Dividends and Capital Gains?</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/how-can-obama-look-at-these-two-charts-and-conclude-that-america-should-have-higher-double-taxation-of-dividends-and-capital-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/how-can-obama-look-at-these-two-charts-and-conclude-that-america-should-have-higher-double-taxation-of-dividends-and-capital-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital gains tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed yesterday, the most important number in Obama’s budget is that the burden of government spending will be at least $2 trillion higher in 10 years if the President’s... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/how-can-obama-look-at-these-two-charts-and-conclude-that-america-should-have-higher-double-taxation-of-dividends-and-capital-gains/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[As discussed yesterday, the most important number in Obama’s budget is that the burden of government spending will be at least $2 trillion higher in 10 years if the President’s plan is enacted.

But there are also some very unsightly warts in t]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/how-can-obama-look-at-these-two-charts-and-conclude-that-america-should-have-higher-double-taxation-of-dividends-and-capital-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>According to Obama’s Budget, Burden of Federal Spending Will Be $2 Trillion Higher in 10 Years</title>
		<link>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/according-to-obama%e2%80%99s-budget-burden-of-federal-spending-will-be-2-trillion-higher-in-10-years/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/according-to-obama%e2%80%99s-budget-burden-of-federal-spending-will-be-2-trillion-higher-in-10-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomandprosperity.org/?p=8651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama’s budget proposal was unveiled today, generating all sorts of conflicting statements from both parties. Some of the assertions wrongly focus on red ink rather than the size of... <a class="meta-more" href="http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/according-to-obama%e2%80%99s-budget-burden-of-federal-spending-will-be-2-trillion-higher-in-10-years/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[President Obama’s budget proposal was unveiled today, generating all sorts of conflicting statements from both parties.

Some of the assertions wrongly focus on red ink rather than the size of government. Others rely on dishonest Washington budge]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomandprosperity.org/2012/blog/big-government/according-to-obama%e2%80%99s-budget-burden-of-federal-spending-will-be-2-trillion-higher-in-10-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

