In today’s global economy, governments face pressure to reduce tax rates in order to keep investment and entrepreneurial talent from moving to lower-tax environments. This is what is known as tax competition and it is an important check on excessive government power and control, both domestically and internationally.
High-tax nations, not surprisingly, want to stop tax competition. Working through the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), these countries are seeking to dictate tax policy around the world in order to protect themselves from competition. At their behest, the OECD has launched a campaign to shut down small low-tax regimes (the so-called tax havens), and also is trying to dictate tax policy in larger nations, including the United States, by identifying supposedly “unfair” tax policies that attract investment from overseas.
The OECD plan is wrong. Tax competition between countries should be celebrated, not persecuted. As a Heritage Foundation paper on the issue states, tax competition “forces politicians to be more responsible, pushing tax rates down and allowing people to enjoy more of the money they earn. Tax competition is a particularly good thing for the United States, drawing savings, investment, and skilled labor into the economy.”
The OECD’s campaign against tax competition is ill-advised for a number of reasons. For instance, it is:
- An Attack on Taxpayers. The OECD is trying to create a cartel of high-tax nations. This arrangement – sort of an OPEC for politicians – would mean higher taxes and undermine any hope for meaningful tax reform.
- An Attack on Free Trade and Global Commerce. The OECD urges member nations to penalize low-tax regimes with severe and discriminatory financial protectionism. In effect, the OECD wants to impose a financial blockade against targeted nations.
- An Attack on Sovereignty. The OECD not only is trying to bully “tax havens” into raising their tax rates and eliminating financial privacy, but also asserts the right to interfere with American tax laws. Sovereign nations should be able to determine their own tax policies.
- An Attack on Privacy. An implicit feature of the OECD campaign is that governments should be allowed to tax income and activities that take place outside their borders. This means that privacy will be sacrificed to make life easier for tax collectors. Moreover, governments want to force financial service companies and professional service providers to spy on their customers to help track down additional tax revenue.
Organizations affiliated with Coalition for Tax Competition
| American Enterprise Institute | The Heritage Foundation | |
| American Legislative Exchange Council | Independent Women’s Forum | |
| Americans for Tax Reform | Institute for Policy Innovation | |
| American Shareholders Association | IRET | |
| Association of Concerned Taxpayers | National Center for Policy Analysis | |
| Capital Research Center | National Retail Sales Tax Alliance, Inc | |
| Cato Institute | National Small Business United | |
| CF&P Foundation | National Tax Limitation Committee | |
| Citizens for a Sound Economy | National Taxpayers Union | |
| The Club for Growth | The Performance Institute | |
| Coalition for Tax Competition | The Potomac Foundation | |
| Coalitions for America | Privacilla.org | |
| Competitive Enterprise Institute | Public Interest Institute | |
| Council for Citizens Against Gov’t Waste | 60 Plus Association | |
| Discovery Institute | Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council | |
| Empower America | Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. | |
| Free Congress Foundation | The Sovereign Society | |
| Freedom Alliance | United Seniors Association | |
| Frontiers of Freedom Institute | U.S. Chamber of Commerce |
For more information, or to join the Coalition for Tax Competition, please contact us at ctc@freedomandprosperity.org.
Coalition Letters & Statements
- Letter to President Bush on Anti-Money Laundering Legislation
- Letter on Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Letter to OMD Director Daniels Opposing Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Letter to Secretary O’Neill Urging Adoption of Territorial Tax System
- Letter Urging Rejection of Fiscal Protectionism
- Letter to Rep. Thomas on Tax Code Changes
- Letter to Secretary O’Neill on Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Thank-You Letter to Rep. Sweeney
- Letter to Secretary Snow on Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Letter on OECD Funding
- Second Letter to Secretary Snow on Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Letter to OMB Director Bolten on OECD Funding
- Third Letter to Secretary Snow on Interest-Reporting Regulation
- Letter to Henry Paulson on Protecting Tax Competition
- Letter to World Bank
- Letter Against a Value-Added Tax
- Letter on FATCA